'cd'ed inside the repository directory (same level as '.hg' directory 3. And also, the user will have the chance to appear in our latest codeswarm. opened command prompt as administrator user 2. This way, the fix, the new capability, etc will be maintain in the upcoming version of OTB. We will then review the corrections, test them and then merge them into the main repository. We will be informed that something new is in the sandbox, but you can also drop a mail at to provide more explanations.When ask for the login use “anonymous” with the password “otb”. If necessary, use the -f option (we will sort out the mess). when you are happy, push to the sandbox.work as usual, commit locally as you would do for your own project.Set up your mercurial identity, in Linux, edit the ~/.hgrc and put the following lines:.To make this process easier, we’ve just created a “sandbox” repository for OTB which works as a testing environment that isolates untested code changes and outright experimentation from the production environment or repository. Unlikely if he is just interested in using the program and on his way fixed a bug. The main argument of the DVCS is that a contributor can go out and say “hey guys, here is my cool version, come and pull from it”, but that involve him setting up a public repository. checkout Mercurial keyring repository and add to HOME/.hgrc the following. But there is still the problem of sharing. Thankfully Windows 10 has a wonderful option nowadays to fix this issue. With the availability of distributed VCS (mercurial, git, bazar), part of this problem disappear: the user can work locally and benefit from the VCS, it also makes the patch generation easier. But that raises another question: do you really want anybody to be able to put his/her contribution without any check? Sometimes, the contribution could break another capabilities, sometimes a different solution to fix the problem might be more appropriate, sometimes, this is not the time to integrate risky modifications… That the case why in most open source projects, the core team of people with commit access is limited. The more obvious solution is to give access to the version control system to the potential contributors: this way, they can fully contribute and the integration is easy. On the other side, the project member integrating the patch has to find the correct version against which the patch applies, he has to fight with the line breaks if the patch was submitted by email. Repository model describes the relationship between various copies of the source code repository.In a clientserver model, users access a master repository via a client typically, their local machines hold only a working copy of a project tree. Generating a patch is not straightforward for the user (he needs to compare with the original version if he still has it) and worst, he doesn’t get the benefits of version control systems. The burden of patches is both on the user himself and on the project member doing the integration. i have 2 local repositories, cloned different (http-based) sources, require different authentication credentials pull-push. For most open source projects, integration of patches provided by willing users if not an easy task and it often falls behind.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |